Original Article

Does Maxillary Protraction with Alt-RAMEC Protocol Affect Inferior Sclera Exposure? A Controlled 3dMD Study
  • Yasemin Bahar Acar
  • Hanife Nuray Yılmaz
  • Elvan Önem Özbilen
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 1-6 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.0167
Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification
  • Lale Taner
  • Fatma Deniz Uzuner
  • Yağmur Çaylak
  • Zeynep Gençtürk
  • Emine Kaygısız
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 1-5 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18048
Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Anterior Biteplane Treatment on Temporomandibular Joint in Patients with Deep Bite
  • Bengisu Akarsu Güven
  • Semra Ciğer
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 8-12 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19108
Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study
  • Marco Serafin
  • Rosamaria Fastuca
  • Elisabetta Castellani
  • Alberto Caprioglio
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 10-17 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20050
Geometry In Orthodontıcs. The Evaluatıon Of The Sum Of Posterıor Angles In Björk’s Polygon (A Theoretıcal Study)
  • Enis Güray
  • Metin Orhan
  • Cenk Doruk
Turk J Orthod 1994; 7: 17-21 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-7-1-17
The Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of The Effects Of Fränkel's Functıon Regulator (Fr-4) Wıth Lıp-Seal Traınıng In The Soft-Tıssue Profıle On The Treatment Of Angle Class I Skeletal Anterıor Open-Bıte Malocclusıon
  • Elif Erbay
  • Mustafa Ülgen
Turk J Orthod 1993; 6: 20-28 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-6-1-20
The Evaluatıon Of The Relatıon Among Overbıte, Overjet And Angle Clasıfıcatıon
  • Meliha Rübendüz
Turk J Orthod 2002; 15: 28-35 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-15-1-28
The Investıgatıon Of Pre And Posttreatment Cephalometrıc Measurements Of The Subjects Treated By Edgewıse Technıoue
  • Abdulvahit Erdem
  • Erdal Deniz
  • İsmail Ceylan
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 32-38 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-32
Comparıson Of Dıfferent Cephalometrıc Measurements In Dıagnosıs Of Vertıcal Growth Pattern
  • Nazan Küçükkeleş
  • Sibel Biren
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 44-50 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-44
Relationship Between law Positions and Cranial Base Angle
  • Güvenç Başaran
  • Törün Özer
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 49-60 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-1-49
The Relatıonshıp Between Wıts Appraısal And Vertıcal Dentofacıal Dımensıons And The Clınıcal Relıabılıty Of The Wıts Apprasıal
  • Eray Erdoğan
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 56-62 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-56
Mandıbular Values In Adults Wıth Normal Occlusıon
  • Emel Seren
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 58-64 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-58
Errors In Cephalometrıc Measurements
  • Enis Güray
  • Metin Orhan
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 62-65 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-1-62
Wıts Appraısal
  • Ümit Gazilerli
Turk J Orthod 1991; 4: 62-66 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-4-1-62
The Effect Of Sıze, Materıal, Stıffness And Angulatıon On T He Prıctıonal Forces Between Bracket And Archwıre
  • Yahya Tosun
  • Aslıhan M. Ertan Erdinç
  • Banu Dinçer
Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 63-74 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-1-63
Is There Any Difference Between Gonial Angle Values Measured on Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Orthopantomograms?
  • Demet Kaya
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 72-76 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.18076
Optımal Incısor Posıtıons Whıch Must Be Achıeved By Orthodontıc Treatment And Anb Angle In Hypodıvergent Cranıofacıal Pattern
  • Ayşegül Köklü
Turk J Orthod 1991; 4: 73-78 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-4-1-73
The Relatıonshıp Of The Nsar Angle Wıth Sna, Sn, Snd Angles In Adults Of Normal Occlusıon
  • Emel Seren
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 85-88 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-2-85
“The Effects Of The Dıfferent Angulatıon Of The Outer Bows Of The Occıpıtal Headgear-Actıvator Combınatıons On The Dentofacıal Structures
  • Müfide Dinçer
Turk J Orthod 1994; 7: 89-99 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-7-2-89
The Anb Angle Value In Adults Wıth Normal Occlusıon
  • Emel Seren
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 89-91 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-2-89
Study of Compensation for Anterior Open-Bite in High-Angle Skeletal Class 1 Cases
  • Hakan N. İşcan
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 90-98 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.90
Treatment Of Angle Class 11/1 Malocclusıons Wıth The Herbst Applıance
  • Alev Soytarhan
  • Erdal Işıksal
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 94-101 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-94
The Changes İn Angle Kl. II/1 Malocclusions İn Long Term Duration
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 99-108 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.99
Evaluatıon Of The Head Posture In Orthodontıc Malocclusıons
  • Alev Soytarhan
  • Aynur Aras
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 102-106 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-102
Inconsistency between ANB Angle and Wits Appraisal in the Turkish Population
  • Gökhan Serhat Duran
  • Furkan Dindaroğlu
Turk J Orthod 2015; 28: 103-108 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00027R1
Treatment Of Class 2-Hıgh Angle Cases Usıng The Combıned Actıvator-Occıpıtal Headgear
  • Müfide Dinçer
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 114-124 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-114
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Mandibular Plane Angle and Craniofacial Morphology in the Mixed Dentition Period
  • Hakan Türkkahraman
  • M. Özgü Sayın
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 123-129 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-2-123
The Treatment Of Cross-Bıtes In The Angle Class I Cases Wıth Modular 3 D Lıngual Applıances
  • Ali Vehbi Tuncer
  • Nazmi Ertürk
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 129-134 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-129
Application Of “Memory Titanol Spring” During The First Molar Extraction Space Closure
  • Aynur Aras
  • Yahya Tosun
Turk J Orthod 1999; 12: 141-148 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-12-3-141
Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles
  • Hasan Camcı
  • Farhad Salmanpour
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 171-176 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20017
The Study Of The Factors Affectıng Anb Angle
  • Ümit Gazilerli
  • İsmail Ceylan
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 182-186 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-2-182
The Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of The Effects Of Class Iı Intermaxıllary Elastıcs In Non-Extractıon Treatment Of Angle Class II, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıon Wıth Edgewıse Technıque
  • Gülnaz Leblebicioğlu Marşan
  • Türköz Uğur
Turk J Orthod 1997; 10: 193-212 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-10-2-193
Study Of Compensatıon For Anterıor Open-Bıte In Hıgh-Angle Skeletal Class 2 Cases
  • Hakan N. İşcan
  • Ali S. Gültan
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 204-211 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-1-2-204
A Comparison of the Craniofacial Characteristics of High Angle Subjects with or without Openbite
  • Fulya Işık
  • Berna Yüzbaş
  • Korkmaz Sayınsu
  • Tülin Arun
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 215-223 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-3-215
“The Effect Of Cervıcal Headgear On The Frankfort Mandıbular Plane Angle”
  • Oktay Üner
  • Sevil Akkaya
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 218-226 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-1-2-218
Changes in Orbicularis Oris Superior and Masseter Muscle Activities After Upper Incisor Protrusion in Class II Division 2 Malocclusion: An Electromyographic Study
  • Irmak Ocak
  • Abdullah Ruhi Soylu
  • Müge Aksu
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 231-238 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21001
An Investıgatıon Of Profıle Changes In Angle Class I Anomalıes Treated Wıth Extractıon And Nonextractıon
  • Elif Erbay
  • Mustafa Ülgen
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 232-242 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-2-232
In Thıs Study, It Was Investıgated That, Whether The Fr-3 Applıance Was Adequate Or Not In Functional Ortopedic Therapy
  • Osman Bengi
  • İlter Uzel
  • Yalçın Işımer
  • Deniz Sağdıç
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 238-247 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-238
Symptomatics of ANB, SNA and SNB Angles: Longitudinal Test
  • Tunç Altıok
  • Aylin Gümüş
  • Ayşegül Köklü
  • Stom. Zaur Novruzov
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 253-264 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-3-253
Comparıson Of Wıts Appraısal Wıth Palatal Plane/A-B Measurement
  • Mehmet Birol Özel
  • F. Erhan Özdiller
Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 279-293 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-3-279
Comparıson Of Wıts Appraısal Wıth Anb Angle
  • Mehmet Birol Özel
  • F. Erhan Özdiller
Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 294-308 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-3-294

Case Report

Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Open Bite Case
  • Alev Yılmaz
  • Ayça Arman-Özçırpıcı
Turk J Orthod 2014; 27: 9-15 DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-13-00011
The Use of Mini-Plates for the Treatment of a High-Angle, Dual Bite, Class II Malocclusion
  • Celha Borges Costa Alves
  • Maria Alves Garcia Santos Silva
  • José Valladares Neto
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 52-58 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18029
A Nonsurgical Approach to Treatment of High-Angle Class II Malocclusion
  • Alev Aksoy-Doğan
  • Nur Özel
  • Seda Karahanoğlu
Turk J Orthod 2010; 23: 61-70 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-23-1-61
Treatment of Class 11, Division 2 Malocclusion in an Adult Patient Case Report
  • Ayşe Tuba Altuğ
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 73-77 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-1-73
Angle Class II Treatment With 3D Maxillary Bimetric Distalization System (Case Report)
  • Dilek Erdem
  • Ayşe Tuba Altuğ
Turk J Orthod 1999; 12: 104-112 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-12-2-104
Fıxed Herbst Applıance-Occıpıtal Headgear Combınatıon In Hıgh Angle Skeletal Class Iı Cases: Report Of Two Cases
  • Eray Erdoğan
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 114-123 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-1-114
Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction
  • Zeynep Büyükbayraktar
  • Cenk Doruk
  • Hasan Camcı
Turk J Orthod 2017; 30: 126-131 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17033
Treatment of Gummy Smile and High Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Ortognathic Surgery: Report of 2 Cases
  • Alev Yılmaz
  • Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı
  • Sina Uçkan
Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 155-166 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-155
A Sımple Orthodontıc Approach In Late Permanent Dentıtıon For Class Iı/1 Cases: Removable Herbst Applıance
  • Eray Erdoğan
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 236-244 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-2-236

Original Article

Treatment Time of Class II Malocclusion, with and without Mandibular Crowding, Treated with Four Premolar Extractions: A Retrospective Study
  • Guilherme Janson
  • Lucas Nunes Bastos Curty Silva
  • Marcelo Vinicius Valerio
  • Vinicius Laranjeira
  • Ana Niederberger
  • Daniela Garib
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 122-126 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20127